What is wrong with Representative Democracy?
What is wrong with Representative Democracy is the fact of representation
itself. It introduces a cost of agency, because all representative
agents are conflicted between acting on behalf of their constituents versus
acting in their own self interests, which are often in contention.
What is a plebiscitary?
A plebiscitary is a government without representatives, where the electorate
themselves vote on issues of importance, rather than leaving it up to a
representative to hopefully act on their behalf on a litany of political
issues.
Why are Supermajorities more democratic than simple majorities?
A simple majority is agreement by just barely over half those polled: 50+1%. A
supermajority is significantly higher, often 66% (2 to 1 majority) or even 75%
(3 to 1). The word democracy literally means government by the people, so the
more people are actually in agreement on governing policies, the more
democratic those policies are.
Isn't it dangerous to let people make their own laws?
What is more dangerous than letting a supermajority of citizens decide for
themselves what should be their laws, is letting a minority of special
interests manipulate the government, creating legislation beneficial only to
that minority, at the expense of us all.
Won't minority rights be compromised by a tyrannical majority?
Minority rights are enshrined in the Bill of Rights which act as a check on
the power of government, the power of the majority that (should) directs that
government. Inalienable rights are defendable in court against
unconstitutional acts of governments, already, and will continue to be under
plebiscitary democracy. More robust judicial review prior to proposed
bills becoming laws can help to eliminate the costly inefficiencies of having
to challenge unconstitutional legislation after it has been passed. No
conceivable majority would be able to vote away the inalienable rights of any
minority.
What can be done with our thousands of municipal, regional and national politicians and their entourages?
They can spend their time on things far more productive than trying to divine
the public will on various un-prioritized issues and enacting costly
legislation to address these issues.
Can an electronic voting system really be secure?
The voting system being promoted here would be accessible on modern smart
phones, would require 3 point biometric identification login and would have
end-to-end encryption, and this more secure than what is now being used for
world wide financial transactions. Additionally, a block-chain style of
database backup could be used, keeping the entire vote-chain copied to
millions of devices (like with bitcoin).
What about all the pre-existing laws already on the books created by minority representation?
All laws created before plebiscitary democracy would have to be ratified by
the new supermajority of plebiscitarians, because far too many laws now have
been passed by minority interests which the majority did not support and would
not support in a plebiscitary democracy.
Won't poor people just tax the rich out of existence with their votes?
If the poor people comprise more than 66% of the population, by plebiscitary
democracy they could vote for the tax burden to be shifted to wealth, those
succeeding the most from society.
How will existing agencies created by acts of past governments be able to operate without politicians directing them?
Public servants can be appointed by lottery of qualified applicants for
limited terms, to operate existing agencies and future ones created by
plebiscitary democracy.
How can special interests lobby government representatives to get legislation passed in a plebiscitary?
They can't.
How will new agencies be created by new acts of plebiscitary democracy?
Primary legislation are Acts of government, laws created by governments.
Secondary legislation is interpreting how best to effect primary legislation.
In plebiscitary democracy, primary legislation is passed only by
supermajority, but secondary legislation can be generated by qualified public
servants.
How can civil service administrators be appointed if not by corrupt politicians rewarding them for favours?
Plebiscitary democracy can put an end to this corruption by having civil
service appointments made by lottery of qualified candidates rather than
representatives appointing their financial supporters
Don't we need complex legislation created by intelligent people only, in order to best govern a free, democratic country?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
Who will write the complex acts of government necessitated by new laws passed by plebiscitary democracy?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
How can we keep bad laws from getting passed by governments?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
How will supreme court justices be appointed?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
Can we still have a president to represent our country on the world stage with plebiscitary democracy?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
Who will foreign ministers report to, if not to the politicians that appointed them?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
How can the armed forces operate without a commander in chief?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
How can a plebiscitary democracy act quickly enough in times of strife?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
Who will oversee secret government activities?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.
Is plebiscitary democracy some sort of socialism or communism?
This website is under construction. Look back soon to find content here.